Hitting the database in testing is bad.
Something that I’ve found relatively useful at work is to use real Active Record objects without any persistence (basically use AR#new and not AR#save[!] or AR#create[!]). When using standard techniques to create the association objects in memory you only get one side of the association at a time. Consider the following.
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :addresses end class Address < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :person end # One sided relationship with parent getting access to child chris = Person.new home = chris.addresses.build chris.addresses.first => #<home> home.person => nil # One sided relationship with child getting access to parent home = Address.new chris = home.build_person chris.addresses => [] home.person => #<chris> # The example above that creates the address first could also have been written as. # chris = Person.new # home = Address.new(:person => chris)
You can see that in each case, only one side of the relationship has access to the other. If we were persisting the objects then the relationship would be two way via a database lookup. We can get a two way relationship in memory; although it has a certain duplication smell about it. Assuming the same models as above, we can amend the above examples like so.
# First example chris = Person.new home = chris.addresses.build(:person => chris) chris.addresses.first => #<home> home.person => #<chris> # Second example home = Address.new chris = home.build_person(:addresses => [home]) home.person => #<chris> chris.addresses.first => #<home>
I’ve occasionally used this in place of stubbing methods but am still not 100% convinced of the definite benefits one way or another. I do have some definite disadvantages of stubbing methods (nothing exciting, they’ve almost certainly been noted by many others in the past) which I’ll note down at a later date.
deferred until inspiration hits
by
Chris Roos
is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales License